Sudan:Communique of the 213th Meeting of the Peace and Security Council

The Peace and Security Council of the African Union (AU), at its 213rd meeting held on 22 December 2009, considered the Report of the Mission undertaken by the Council to the Sudan, from 23rd to 25th November 2009, and adopted the following decision:

Council:

1. Takes note of the Report [PSC/PR/CCXIII] on the PSC field mission which visited the Sudan from 23rd to 25th November 2009;

2. Stresses the need to re?energize the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and to accelerate the process of post?conflict reconstruction and socio?economic development in South Sudan. In this respect, Council further stresses the importance of the AU Ministerial Committee on Post?Conflict Reconstruction of the Sudan and encourages the Committee to intensify its efforts;

3. Emphasizes the need, given the challenges related to the general elections in April 2010 and the referendum in early 2011, for the AU to accelerate the implementation of the recommendations of the African Union High Level Panel on Darfur (AUPD) in line with the
decision adopted by Council at its 207th meeting held at the level of Heads of State and Government in Abuja, Nigeria, on 29 October 2009;

Relevant Links
East Africa
North Africa
Sudan
Peacekeeping
Conflict
4. Expresses concern at the continuing lack of confidence between the National Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudan Peoples’ Liberation Movement (SPLM) regarding the implementation of the CPA, which affects preparations for the referendum scheduled for early 2011. In this regard, stresses the need for the AU, and IGAD, with the support of the international community, to assist in renewing confidence between the two parties;

5. Notes the challenges faced by the Sudan in both the implementation of the CPA and the upcoming elections in April 2010, as well as the preparations for the referendum. In this respect, Council decides to establish an Ad Hoc Committee on Sudan to assist in addressing the challenges. Council further agrees to undertake field missions to Sudan in support of the peace processes in that country;

6. Requests the Chairperson of the Commission to submit to it regular reports on the evolution of the situation in Sudan;

7. Decides to remain seized of the matter.

Source:allafrica.com/

Pollution fears taint Sudan's oil promise

Unity State, Sudan (CNN) -- With production levels of a half-million barrels of oil a day and rising, Sudan's oil should be a blessing for its people, but is it a curse?

A German human rights group says pollution in certain oil fields in Southern Sudan is contaminating the drinking water and hurting the local population. CNN traveled to the oil fields of Unity State to investigate the reports.

It is not a place that gets many visitors. The oil processing facility of the Greater Nile Operating Company is in a remote part of southern Sudan, near the poor and dusty communities of Unity State.

We're able to get in with the Governor of Unity State, Taban Deng, though it's clear we are not welcome. A company security agent takes photos throughout our visit.

The governor is a worried man. He knows that oil exploration has the potential to change Southern Sudan, but he's anxious that the benefits will be siphoned off by the government in Khartoum, despite revenue-sharing agreements.

As we walk around the plant, Deng's frustration shows. "If you ask me how do we produce this oil, how do we market it, how do we divide the revenue of the oil, Southern Sudan is not party to that."



Gallery: Sudan's oil curse

Video: Sudan's paradise lost? Greater Nile is not a Sudanese company. Its major shareholders are Chinese, Malaysian and Indian companies; the Sudanese government has a minor stake. It's one of several operating in this vast area -- gaining a toehold in what may be the next big 'oil story.'

It's already a billion-dollar industry with vast untapped reserves throughout Southern Sudan.

It's not just about how to share the profits. Deng says local people complain of new sicknesses since oil exploration began. "There is a lot of pollution in the oil fields. The water [that] is separated from the oil is left uncontrolled."

Greater Nile says it has conducted tests that refute such claims and told CNN its plants comply with international environmental standards.

But there are disturbing allegations about environmental damage in a nearby oilfield operated by White Nile Petroleum, in which the Chinese and Sudanese state oil companies have substantial shares.

A German group, "Sign of Hope," has spent 18 months taking and testing more than 50 water samples and has submitted its results to the United Nations. It says it has found "persuasive" evidence of contamination.

Hydrologists working for the group found salinity and nitrates in drinking wells near White Nile's oil fields that were many times the internationally recommended levels. They also found high concentrations of minerals such as cadmium and lead in mud pits at more than 30 abandoned boreholes.

The group claims these heavy metals could find their way into drinking water supplies, and says it found chromium in one well that measured eight times the WHO guideline. Chromium is a known carcinogen.

The company did not return several calls seeking comment, but on its Web site says the claims of 'Sign of Hope' are baseless. White Nile says it continuously tests the quality of its waste water and adheres to the highest international standards. It adds that high levels of salinity are natural in the area's swamplands.

If this part of Southern Sudan was endless desert, the argument might be less significant. But the oilfields are on the edge of the Sudd, the largest wetlands on Africa, and an area certified by the United Nations in 2006 as of international importance.

Stretching over 30,000 square kilometers, the Sudd supports an array of wildlife and waters adjacent pastureland. It acts both as a huge sponge and a filter for much of east Africa and is vulnerable to pollution and degradation.

The Nuer people who live in the village of Rier, at the edge of the Sudd and the oilfields don't have the means to test the water they and their livestock use. Nor does the regional government, which says only that it's "suspicious" of the water quality in this area.

The villagers just relate what they see. One of them, John Mayal, says that before the oil companies arrived "our cattle didn't die and our children didn't die. Our water was good...now the water is bad."

There is no independent evidence that the oil companies' operations have caused sickness or death; and they certainly deny that. But Deng told CNN oil exploration here has been characterized by one word: mismanagement. "Mismanagement of the resource itself. Mismanagement in the area of protecting the environment , mismanagement in lack of transparency in telling how much we are producing a day."

Production-sharing agreements, scientific analysis of water, drilling technology -- all of that is beyond the people of Rier, whose homes were moved three years ago to make way for oil installations.

They live alongside the best road in Southern Sudan, built by the oil companies, and next to the pipeline that takes the oil north to be refined and exported.

But they are some of the poorest people in the world; reduced to collecting reeds along the roadside for the roofing of their traditional dwellings.

And they collect their water from a huge steel tanker parked in the village by White Nile Oil. They don't trust the wells they have used for centuries.

Source:edition.cnn.com/